B2B Lead Generation BlogReachForce
B2B Marketing
 
   

Customer Experience Index Scoring - Part 5 - B2B Marketing and Sales Tip #185

On with the 5th drop in a series (#1) (#2) (#3) (#4) discussing Customer Experience Indexing (CEI™) as a way to measure, plan and act on customer feedback. All questions and comments are extremely welcome and I do appreciate those who have already jumped in.

Working our way down a list of six areas:

  1. Planning
  2. Optimizing the flow of both loyalty and satisfaction feedback
  3. Analysis of feedback and calculation of actionable CEI metrics
  4. (We are here) Using the data for short, mid and long term account plans for retention and growth
  5. Using the data to locate new prospects using rule based company profiling and role-based targeting
  6. Using the data to plan and deliver action plans aimed at reshaping customer attitudes and opinions

In the last installment (#4), we rolled out some quick analysis of data from a recent ReachForce Customer Experience survey ― zeroing in on the different angle we took by measuring prompted versus non-prompted advocacy  — and what differences exist between companies that are a reference account (92% spending x amount) versus a full blown advocate (73% spending y amount).

It is, glory be, nice to have such high numbers for both reference accounts and advocates at ReachForce. And it’s even nicer to know that as satisfied customers (x) evolve into proactive advocates (y) they also tend, as explained last drop, to buy software and services more often, and in greater amounts (#4). So as a Customer Success team planner it becomes imperative to first figure out why it happens – and set out a continuous plan of improvement to make it more predictable.

To get there, we first establish the Key Weight - or how long and how often does a customer “experience” your company? I have been scolded for this approach in the past by people who say it’s not fair or smart to weigh qualitative feedback from new or infrequent customers more lightly than older ones, and I understand the concern. But I don’t think of it as lower weight = less important (all feedback is important) ― rather, lower weight = less sure.

To work a very simple example, if planning 2009 MBOs for our project managers requires a comparison of two key accounts assigned to the same Project Manager, the following analysis might be used to help step us in the right direction:

For key account planning these numbers tell me the project manager (PM) assigned to these two customers is delivering high marks on both quantitative (data accuracy?) and qualitative (expertise?) fronts ― and with two very different scenarios (new customer/once per month and old customer/once per week). This is good. But because the lower of the cross tab scores are from the (quantitative) ‘PM expertise?’ question, I can foresee the MBOs assigned to the PM in the case of both customers will be warm, fuzzy and relationship directed in order to bolster the customer’s perception of the PM’s expertise. Or maybe the PM gets more training. And closing the planning loop, I’d probably use “Moving Customer 2 up to weekly engagement” as another measurable objective. A higher level of meaningful contact would help.

And as you can see by looking at the % Analysis Scores above, without factoring the Key Weight in the above example, you’d only be fooling yourself about Customer 2 data accuracy and PM Expertise ratings, because you would not be taking newness, or lower frequency metrics into account and an important danger or opportunity might be overlooked. To some, planning account by account MBO strategy this way may seem overly analytical, but I have found no better way to customize and create MBOs to and pinpoint action plans right where the rubber hits the road.

To get some ideas about which cross tab questions to use as lenses for various situations, think of it in terms of Value Delivery (quantitative) versus Obstacles for Value Delivery (qualitative) ― as in our example of Data Accuracy versus Project Manager Expertise ― wherein bad Project Management would be an obvious obstacle to delivering high Data Accuracy.

I’d be happy to provide further example scenarios here, but I think you get the drift. Remember, I think it’s less of a service to create some sort of template, than it is to just spark some thought and let folks craft CEI indexing tools that mean the most to your specific world.

Next week we’ll look at a few more of these CEI ‘planning lenses.’

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • Sphinn
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • MisterWong
  • Mixx
  • Furl


January 6th, 2009 | No Comments » |
 

Book Club Wrap-Up - ReachForce Book Club

Hope you enjoyed this quarter’s Book Club series.  Just in case you missed an eBook or whitepaper we read and discussed, below are the links to them and what we had to say about each of them.

Happy Reading.  We look forward to sharing even more B2B Marketing and Sales tips with you in 2009.

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • Sphinn
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • MisterWong
  • Mixx
  • Furl


December 30th, 2008 | No Comments » |
 

The 6 Principles of Deliberate Marketing: Role vs. Title - B2B Marketing and Sales Tip #184

This is the third post in a series on Deliberate Marketing. Be sure to check out the first post on Intention vs. Attention and the second post on Qualified Buyers vs. Leads.

Deliberate Marketing programs do not rely simply on prospect titles for targeting potential buyers.

For example, a B2B Marketer purchases a list or accesses a contact database and pulls a list of 1,000 Communications Analysts. How can that marketer be certain that the contacts who match those titles are involved with Network Communications instead of Corporate Communications?

Titles are simply a label of rank, not an indication of the actual role the prospect plays in the organization or in the buying decision. Instead, Deliberate Marketing programs are focused on “roles,” defined by Webster’s as: a function or part performed. They target communications based on organizational role and level in the DMU as well as stage of the buying cycle.

The average B2B marketing response rate is less than 3%, and it’s getting lower every year. It’s easy to see why title-based lists perform so poorly.

Consider a Fortune 500 company with 90,000 employees.
All told, this company has 500 IT staff.
Of those 500, 150 have a title of Manager, Director, and higher.
Only a handful of those 150 is in the right role to buy your product.

But what’s a marketer to do? Using current list technology, you can only get as specific as target title. So you have to market to all 150 people with ‘hot titles’, jamming the inboxes of the majority with an unwanted, off-topic solicitation. It’s simply not a cost-effective model.

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • Sphinn
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • MisterWong
  • Mixx
  • Furl


December 29th, 2008 | No Comments » |
 

It’s the Holiday Season, Time to Get Social

2008 has been a big year for B2B Marketers.  The idea of using social media as part of our lead generation programs has become a reality.  Whether it be blogging, Twitter, LinkedIn or Facebook B2B Marketers are taking on new challenges and figuring out new ways to reach their audience through the readily available social media outlets.  Here’s a list of some great social media posts from this year.  There’s lot of lists and dos and don’ts, if we’ve left a great post out, let us know, we’ll add it to the list.

50 Ways Marketers Can Use Social Media to Improve their Marketing

10 Aspects of an Effective Social Media Campaign

How to Build a Community of Twitter Followers

Ten Elements Every Company Blog Should Have

6 Keys to Bringing Up Social Media

24 Things to do When Stuck for a Topic to Blog About

Health Check:  How Trusted is your Corporate Blog?

Internet Marketing Roundup

5 Musts of Business Blogging

50 Social Media & Marketing Predictions for 2009

5 Tips for Promoting Your Business Page on Facebook

If you’re already knee deep in the world of social media, please share some of your successes or experiences.  Are you able to measure real ROI?

Happy Holidays and thank you for following us on The B2B Lead.  We look forward to sharing more B2B Marketing and Sales best practices with you in 2009.

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • Sphinn
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • MisterWong
  • Mixx
  • Furl


December 23rd, 2008 | No Comments » |
 

The 6 Principles of Deliberate Marketing: Qualified Buyers vs. Leads - B2B Marketing and Sales Tip #183

This is the second post in a series on Deliberate Marketing. Be sure to check out the first post on Intention vs. Attention.

Sales teams are always clamoring for more leads but smart marketers know that what they really need to deliver are qualified buyers.  A lead status is often applied to anyone who fills out a form on your website or stops by your trade show booth.  Rather than tossing that list of names over to sales, marketers must nurture those leads and weed out the good from the bad, those with budget and need from those still in the education phase.

Deliberate Marketing ensures marketers can extract the most value from their marketing programs based on using the most cost-effective method to move prospects and buyers through the funnel. It is not focused on simply filling the marketing and sales funnel with contacts and expecting sales to follow-up on any lead that downloads a whitepaper.

Deliberate Marketing is about profiling the best possible buyers, recruiting more buyers that are just like them, and then executing the most effective techniques possible to move the prospect through each stage of the funnel.

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • Sphinn
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • MisterWong
  • Mixx
  • Furl


December 22nd, 2008 | No Comments » |
 

Publish your Content for Free – B2B Marketing and Sales Tip #182

So…you have written white papers and eBooks and they are up on your website. They are probably on the resources page and get their fair share of downloads. That’s good, but with some of the free publishing sites out there you can get more exposure.

I have started to put ReachForce content on some of the sites and wanted to share the results, compare with you or ask if you had suggestions.

Content placement sites:

Scribd – the best content placement site I think. You can publish, discover and discuss original writings and documents. It’s easy to set up…sign up and make an account for free, then just upload your documents. I have uploaded all of ReachForce’s eBooks and have gotten 5476 views as of today. People can add your works to their favorites and rate them. You can join groups an add friends.

Docstoc – provides the platform for users and businesses to upload and share their documents with all the world, and serves as a vast repository of documents in variety of categories including legal, business, financial, technology, educational, and creative. I uploaded all our eBooks and have 300 views and 30 downloads as of today.

edocr – upload your documents for sharing by the professional and business community. I uploaded our eBooks, again, and we have 618 views so far. One of our eBooks was featured on the front page when first uploaded.

whitepapers.org – is “all the world’s whitepapers in one place.” I really haven’t figured out how to see how many views or downloads our whitepapers have had.

The pros of publishing your content on sites like this is that it is free to do and can bring unexpected visitors an exposure. The biggest con I can find is that there is really no way to find out who downloaded our content (with information like an email address). To help with this, we added links to all our whitepapers and eBooks to hopefully drive traffic back to our website.

Suggestions?

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • Sphinn
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • MisterWong
  • Mixx
  • Furl


December 19th, 2008 | 3 Comments |
 

How to Choose Your Carrot - ReachForce Book Club

This week we’re reading and talking about Connect Direct’s whitepaper – How to Choose Your Carrot: Effective Lead Generation Offers for High-Technology Marketers.  Author Howard Sewell opens with the 3 key elements of any campaign:

  1. List
  2. Offer
  3. Creative

You know here at ReachForce we are all about data (lists) that fuels lead generation programs so it was great to see that at the top of the list.  He goes on to say that “creative still rules the roost” for most marketers.  I totally agree and don’t get how people spend so much time and effort on creative that will end up going to the wrong person.  But that’s another post all together…

Then there’s the offer – another piece many marketers have a hard time getting right.

“An offer is a reason to respond – the ‘carrot’ that gets the reader to take action.”

When deciding on your offer, remember to “Sell the Offer, not the Product”.  Howard goes on to say, “no matter how enticing your product or service sounds, you won’t generate leads unless people want what you’re offering”.  I totally agree.

Choosing the right offer – here comes the good stuff…

First, you must decide what the primary objective is for your campaign.  Is it to:

  • Build awareness
  • Build your in-house list
  • Generate sales opportunities
  • Drive prospects to a meeting immediately

For each of these, you’re offer would be different.  On page 4 of the whitepaper, check out Fig 1.  It is a great visual of different offers and what outcomes to expect with each.  The basic idea is the more you ask of someone, the more qualified they will be.  Doing a raffle for an iPod will drive responders but probably not the quality your sales team is looking for.

The remainder of the whitepaper goes on in detail about the pros and cons of different offers like free trials, webinars, whitepapers, surveys and sweepstakes.  If you haven’t already read this one, you want to.  “Select your offer carefully.  The choice between one offer and the next will have a dramatic effect on your response rate and the quality of the leads you generate.

About the Author
Howard J. Sewell is president and founder of Connect Direct. Prior to starting the company in
1990, he served as a marketing manager for software giant Oracle Corporation. Howard is a frequent speaker on direct marketing and regular contributor to print publications and online forums on topics that include lead generation, e-mail marketing, channel development and event promotion. He writes “Direct Connections,” a leading blog on best practices and strategies for B2B direct marketing.

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • Sphinn
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • MisterWong
  • Mixx
  • Furl


December 18th, 2008 | No Comments » |
 

The 6 Principles of Deliberate Marketing: Intention vs. Attention - B2B Marketing and Sales Tip #181

Does your sales team ignore the majority of leads marketing passes on?  Marketers must develop a more intimate understanding of their target customer and the market that customer serves to generate qualified buyers that Sales won’t ignore. Marketers must align their efforts with the Sales organization and streamline the Marketing and Sales funnel to accelerate the rate at which leads move through their funnel.

Deliberate Marketing is a proven strategy for putting more qualified buyers directly into the Marketing and Sales funnel to generate faster ROI. It is especially effective in the B2B Marketing space which is characterized by defined target markets, long sales cycles and complex buyer-seller relationships. Over the next few weeks, I will be covering The 6 Principles of Deliberate Marketing in hopes of helping B2B Marketers start off the new year with a new approach to drive more successes.

Principle #1: Intention vs. Attention

Do you know if your marketing programs are gathering intention or attention?  Intention means you have hit the right audience with the right message and they have responded to your call to action.  Attention means they looked at your message but they may not have been your buyer and there was no call to action. By focusing on intention vs. attention, you may have fewer leads to pass onto sales but those leads will be more qualified.

Deliberate Marketing involves researching your customers in order to build insight into their pain points and the medium through which they respond best to marketing messages. This research enables Marketers to deliver laser-focused messages and programs that convert buyer interest to buyer intent. It is not about spreading high level marketing messages to a broad audience via advertising or public relations hoping to garner attention for a product or company.

Rather, Deliberate Marketing is focused on converting a targeted segment of prospects into qualified buyers with an interest in purchasing a product or service. This involves knowing far more about your target audience than any list buy, database or telemarketing firm can ever provide.

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • Sphinn
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • MisterWong
  • Mixx
  • Furl


December 17th, 2008 | 3 Comments |
 

Cleaning Up Your Marketing Database - B2B Marketing and Sales Tip #180

I’ve been talking to a lot of people these days about database hygiene. Many have asked for best practices amounting to a “get well, stay well” healthy data routine. We do have a great white paper on this subject, Is Dirty Data Sabotaging Your Marketing Results?

One step is to make sure that users of your CRM system have a handy/easy way to “flag” inaccurate contact records.

If you are a salesforce.com customer, here is a way to help in this area:
The instructions/advice below requires administrative privileges in salesforce.com.

FINDING DIRTY DATA/EXCEPTION REPORTING

1. A field must be designated for data quality/lead quality to be reported through.  For instance, here, we use our “Lead Status” field and have created custom values in the pick-list to accommodate the error reporting.  Example: Bounce Back (Email); Wrong Phone Number; Contact No Longer There, Company Closed/Acquired.

a) A pick-list type field is best for this because it standardizes the options for reporting.
b) We have found it useful to go beyond the simple “Bounce Back, Wrong Phone Number” type of justifications for a contact being wrong and include information such as Company Acquired/Closed (with a custom field allowing users to input the company it was acquired by), Company No Fit: No budget/need, Wrong Contact: Need higher level contact/lower level contact, etc.  Once you have a basic infrastructure for error reporting customizing the field to your organization’s needs is easy.

2. After the field is in place and has begun being used, create a custom report that pulls the data you wish to report on.  It is typically much easier to report on the exceptions (the wrong data) rather than the correct data.

  • Go to the “Reports” tab, select “Create New Custom report”
  • Choose “Leads”
  • Use a tabular report format
  • The columns we use are:
  • Lead Owner
  • First Name
  • Last  Name
  • Title
  • Company/Account
  • Lead Source
  • Lead Status
  • Created Date
  • Created Month
  • Street Address
  • City
  • State/Province
  • Zip/Postal Code
  • Country
  • Phone
  • Email
  • Website
  • RF Internal Project (*Custom field, created to denote what project each
  • contact came from)
  • Nothing needs to be summarized on the standard summary fields
  • Any changes in the placement of columns is strictly based on personal preference

For report criteria the following is important:
a) View - choose All leads.  Date/Duration/Start & End Date - leave the standard “Create Date” and “Custom” settings but delete the date in the “Start Date” field - leaving it blank ensures all possible data is captured in the report.
b) Advanced Filters:

  • Field - Lead Status (or whatever field you have elected to use to report the error data in)
  • Operator - contains
  • Value - Whatever error messaging you have input, for example “Bounce Back, Wrong Phone Number, Contact No Longer There.”  If you have used a pick-list to populate the field then you will be able to use the look up (looking glass icon next to “AND”) to select all relevant information.

Here at ReachForce, we run this report on a weekly basis, but companies with less sales reps or reps who make fewer calls won’t necessarily need to run the report that frequently, conversely companies with lots of reps or reps who burn up the phones will want to run an error report more often.

RE-IMPORTING NEW/CLEAN DATA

To avoid lead duplication, it is best to export the bad data with a unique identifier (like the Lead ID provided by salesforce.com) and then re-import  the data using the same identifier. By using the Lead ID, you can ensure that notes and activity history that were previously attached to the record are not lost in the process.

It is important to remember to reset the Lead Status field once the data has been cleaned up (or whatever custom field designates the data as bad) so that sales reps calling on the data know it is ready to be called on again.  Here at ReachForce we also have a “born on date” for our refreshed data.  In that field we import the date that the records were updated in salesforce.com so that the rep calling on the record always knows how current the information is.

After data has been cleaned up, it is important to continue to keep the data up to date, using the error reporting discussed above and setting a time-table for how long it takes for a lead to “expire” allows you to keep all of the data in your database fresh.  For example, if a lead is new on 9/1/2007, it is safe to assume that by 9/1/2008 it might be in need of an update.

DATA SCORING/RECORD COMPLETENESS

We have found it useful to leverage a free AppExchange program put out by salesforce Labs called “Data Quality Analysis Dashboard 1.0″ to give better visibility into the completeness of records and what deficiencies exist. This package installs a set of dashboards and reports that give scores to each type of record within your CRM and then provide high level views of how your records score.  Using this tool can give you a better idea of where your records need improvement and/or if particular types of records are better kept than others.

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • Sphinn
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • MisterWong
  • Mixx
  • Furl


December 16th, 2008 | No Comments » |
 

Spend time with Sales and you’ll be a Better Marketer - B2B Marketing and Sales Tip #179

This week The Funnelholic had a great tip for marketers getting ready to go into 2009, and we wanted to pass it on to The B2B Lead readers.

“Do ‘ride-alongs’ with sales as you consider your marketing plans.”  So often we are busy putting programs and campaigns in place without even asking sales (our customer) if it’s what they need to move leads to opportunities and opportunities to customers.  “If you really want to add value as a marketer, you have to identify the ‘have-to-have’s’ for your customers, the sales team. The best way to do it, is to see for yourself.”

He then goes on to list a couple of great ideas on saddling up with your sales team to help do your job better and drive more measurable results.

Check it out and thanks to The Funnelholic for the great tips.

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • Sphinn
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • MisterWong
  • Mixx
  • Furl


December 12th, 2008 | No Comments » |
 
 
 
B2B Marketing Blog
- - -     |     Home     |     About ReachForce     |     Contact     |     Archives     |     - - -